Skip to main content

A Book Review: Walking the Bible: A Journey by Land Through the Five Books of Moses

Walking theBible:  A Journey by Land Through theFive Books of Moses by Bruce Feiler is a book that I downloaded for free on my Kindle.  Whatever the advertising blurb was, it sounded interesting.  After all, it was about the Bible and it was free!


I know this post will be a bit long, but I need to process some of the things this book got me to thinking about, so here goes!

Mr. Feiler has a very engaging writing style. He has the rare ability of helping you imagine in your mind exactly what a place must look like, to make you feel like you’re there, experiencing it with him. For example, upon landing in Cairo, he writes, “The plane taxied to a stop on the tarmac and the door opened onto a slab of thick black air. Stepping on to the stairs, I felt the familiar slap of desert, like staring into a hair dryer.” Describing the traffic in Cairo he writes, “Streets have no particular distinction between where cars should be driven and where they should be parked. …[O]ne is overwhelmed by the sheer volume of cars. Cars in the left lane going in one direction, cars in the right lane going in the same direction. Cars on the sidewalk going in the opposite direction. Cars in the middle parked.”

Because of his engaging and descriptive writing style, the book is easy to read and moves along at a good pace in spite of its length (451 pages, including appendixes at the end).  However, I think the book probably has a limited appeal.  If you are interested in archaeology, the Bible, history (especially ancient history…which explains modern history), the three major religions of the world (Judaism, Islam, Christianity), or travel you would enjoy the book.  If none of those interest you, this book probably isn’t for you.

In brief, Mr. Feiler undertakes a journey to visit the sites where the main stories of the Five Books of Moses take place.  His travel companion was Avner Goren, described as “a romantic, a child of the desert”.  He had been the chief archaeologist of the Sinai region and adds a lot to the story.  Along the fringes of the story is their driver.  The story actually takes place over a period of years and is numerous trips pieced together to make a coherent story.


Most fascinating to me is that Mr. Feiler sets out on this trip to gather facts.  He was born and raised Jewish, but did not consider himself religious.  His faith really meant little to him in his day to day life.
So he was surprised as he traveled and explored how his Jewish faith became meaningful to him.  He says, in explaining different theories people have put forth to explain the plagues:
     “It’s certainly easier to look for naturalistic explanations for seemingly inexplicable phenomena, especially considering the alternative, which would be to attribute them to divine intervention.  When I first started reading the Bible {and by Bible he is referring to the Jewish Old Testament, not including the New Testament} closely I, too, wanted – maybe even needed – to hide behind the screen of history, topography, science.  I was interested in the characters, by which I meant the patriarchs, their wives, Moses, the Israelites.  But in doing so, I was strenuously –at times acrobatically—avoiding showing interest in the central character of the entire book.  I did this, I was coming to see, because I deeply wanted to avoid thinking about that character, about what that character meant to the story, and about what that character might mean to me.  But in doing so, I was shielding myself from a principal storyline of the Bible:  the relationship between humans and the divine.
     “Not until I reached Exodus did I finally begin to recognize the futility of this exercise in self-delusion.  As it happens, the text itself reveals precisely what caused the ten plagues.  God caused them.  To miss that point is to miss the essence of the tale, the battle between the god of the Israelites and the gods of the Egyptians….”

It is sad to me, though, that while he recognizes the Bible to be the story of the central character, of God, and of His relationship to humans, he never seems to quite grasp the eternity of God and is never able to see the full picture of the story of God’s relationship to humans, the redemption offered by the death of His Son on the cross.  Still, I like the way he states that we don’t need a human explanation for much of what happens in the Bible.  The only plausible explanation is that God caused them, God did it, God was at work.

About the Bible itself, Mr. Feiler comes so close to understanding that it is divinely inspired, but never quite hits the nail on the head.  He says:
     “The Bible is not an abstraction in the Middle East, nor even just a book; it’s a living, breathing entity, undiminished by the passage of time.  If anything, the Bible has been elevated to that rare stature of being indefinitely immediate…. [T]he text is forever applicable.  It’s always now.
     “The ability of the Bible to continually reinvent itself is matched only by its ability to make itself relevant to anyone who encounters it.
     “…Put tautologically:  The Bible lives because it never dies.”
He then says, this doesn’t mean the stories are true or that the details are exact and then concludes, “The Bible lives today not because it’s untouchable but precisely because it has been touched – it has been challenged – and it remains undefeated.”

He also has an insightful section on the tension between Islam, which shares many of the same stories, and Jewish and Christian beliefs.  John and I have discussed this much and have come to the same conclusion.  Mr. Feiler is sitting one evening in a Bedouin tent discussing the Bible and the Koran with a group of Muslims and Jewish people.    They’re finding that the stories of the patriarchs often very widely.  For example, the Bible teaches that Abraham was to sacrifice Isaac while the Muslims say it is Ishmael.  The Bible teaches that Moses died on Mount Nebo and that his corpse was never found while the Koran teaches that his place of death is unknown.  During this discussion, Mr. Feiler is getting frustrated.
     “’Between the Koran and the Bible there is a difference over where Moses died,’ Mahmoud repeated.  ‘The Koran doesn’t say.’
     “’But the difference is bigger than that,’ I said.
     “’The main reference to Moses in the Koran –‘ Mahmoud started to say, but I cut him off.
     “’I know the story,’ I said a bit rudely.  ‘The point I want to make is this:  It’s not the same Moses. The Moses in the Bible and the Moses in the Koran are different people.’  Avner, who had been listening nearby, winced.
     “’You mean not physically, but their meaning?’ Mahmoud asked.
     “’Both,’ I said.  ‘We think it’s the same person, but it’s not.’
     “’You’ll never make it as a diplomat,’ Avner remarked dryly.
     “I know under the circumstances, that I should be more gracious, but I couldn’t help myself.  ‘I’m basing my opinion on the fact that for Moses in the Bible, the whole objective, the whole point of his life, is to lead the Israelites into the Promised Land.  To get them to Israel.  Moses in the Koran does not have that.  The Promised Land is not even a factor; it’s not mentioned.  Of course, the Koran doesn’t want to glorify the land of Israel.  It wants to glorify Mecca and Medina.  Therefore, the whole reason Moses lived –according to the Bible – is not mentioned in the Koran.  They’re the same person, but they have different meanings.’
     “…We were dealing with stories, passed around campfires not unlike this one, and written down many years later.  And yet, in each version of the story, the details were different, therefore the meaning was different, therefore the lessons were different.
     “’But we’re talking about different books, different characters, different everything,’ I said.  ‘We may be people of the Book, but since they’re different books, we’re different people.’”
That’s exactly it!  We may have some basic things in common and that gives a good starting point for discussion, but their Abraham is not exactly our Abraham, their Moses is not exactly our Moses, and most importantly, their Allah is not exactly our God. 

Mr. Feiler’s final chapter was very helpful to me.  During the story of Moses, he struggles with something I’ve often wondered about.  In my human mind, it seems so cruel of God to not let Moses enter the Promised Land.  Moses was so faithful, so diligent, he put up with some much junk from the Israelites, and all he did wrong was strike that rock instead of speak to it.  It just seems a bit unfair, like the punishment is way bigger than the offense.  Well, first of all, who am I to say how God should or shouldn’t punish.  But this by Mr. Feiler is helpful to me.  He describes how God took him up on the mountain and showed him all of the Promised Land.  Now, physically speaking, even on the clearest of clear days, it would be impossible to see all of the Promised Land from on top of the mountain.  But, says Mr. Feiler:
“He is given the ability to see what no one else sees.  Denied entry, Moses actually gets more:  He gets prophetic vision, personally granted to him by God.  The Israelites will get the land, but they will continue to struggle with God.  Their leader, however, has fulfillment.  And he reaches this pinnacle not by looking out from the mountain.  For looking out will not show him what he sees….  The land alone is not the destination; the destination is the place where human beings live in consort with the divine.  Ultimately it doesn’t matter that what the Bible describes is impossible to see.  It doesn’t matter because Moses wasn’t seeing as we do.  At the end, he wasn’t even looking at the land.  He was looking where we should look.  He was looking at God.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practice Hospitality

My mother-in-law, Jean, is an amazing person with many gifts.  One of the first things I noticed about her when I was but a young bride, was her gift of hospitality.  It was nothing for her to invite a large group of people over, make each one feel welcome, cook a big meal,and seemingly do it without stressing herself out.  I don't know if hospitality just came naturally to her or if she learned it.  In this picture you can see Jean throwing a party for a class she taught in Nigeria.  




I believe that for me it has been a learned skill.  My parents were hospitable and it wasn't unusual for us to have guests over (though usually not as many at a time as my mother-in-law would do!).  But when I started living on my own, I had to learn hospitality.  The first time I invited somebody over for a meal, the lid got stuck on the pot of vegetables, I put too much salt or soda or something in the muffins, and I forgot to serve milk and sugar with the hot drinks.  I've gotten much bett…

2016 in Review

Let's take a look at the year 2016.

January's big events were the dedication of the Tamajaq New Testament, our annual Spiritual Life Conference, helping friends find a house, a trip to visit missionaries in the bush, attended a big wedding, and celebrated John's birthday. It was a pretty busy month.  My January picture is from our trip to the bush and shows baobab trees.  



February was a little less crazy.  John started taking moolo lessons.  February is the time of year when the fresh fruits and veggies are in season so I did a lot of work to freeze veggies for the hot months ahead.  This picture isn't terribly exciting, but a year after the church burnings this church we helped plant back in 1989 finally had a new ceiling and a fresh coat of paint.



In March we attended another big wedding, froze more veggies, celebrated Easter, and visited a church in another town.  John and I have visited a lot of churches in the past three years as he has done research for his doctora…

Meat Roll-ups

Tonight I made meat roll-ups.  And I got to use some ingredients that made food prep much easier than normal!  I did make two batches of rolls so that John could have a lactose-free meal.

The first thing to do is to brown some hamburger.  With the main batch I stirred a tin of mushroom soup into the browned meat.  For John's batch, I stirred in flour, some almond milk, and seasonings just enough to moisten it, but not to make it really runny.  In Niger, I would make it the second way since we don't have tinned soup.

Next I made a batch of biscuit dough using Bisquick.  Of course, in Niger, I have to make the biscuit dough from scratch.  I mixed it up with the almond milk.  Once the dough is rolled out in a strip, spread the meat mixture on it.  Roll it up like you would cinnamon rolls and cut into slices.  Lay the slices on a cookie sheet and cook in a 350 oven for about 20 minutes.



While they're baking, I browned fresh mushrooms in butter (in Niger I would use tinned mushroo…